Is the Role of the Telephone Declining?
By Graham Williams, Centre-ing
Services
Is the telephone being slowly ousted by cheaper
communication means? Many would disagree with the word "slowly" in
that question. It took less than 40 years for radio to reach 50 million users;
television spread much, much faster. The web reached this number in 4
years—and is still growing exponentially. E-communication and e-commerce is
here to stay. One reputable research organisation has predicted that within 4
years, telephone contact will reduce to 5% of all customer interactions. Others
say that the cost of establishing and running a multi-channel workstation and
employing fully English-proficient agents results in higher customer service
costs - resulting in the telephone being retained as the primary communication
medium. What are the factors at play and how does one take a balanced view?
We do know that more and more customers (and
potential customers) are gaining access to digital communications. Alternative
communication media options continue to expand, and technological and workflow
capabilities improve. As organisations seek the most cost-effective ways of
handling customer interactions, so an increasing body of business people see a
decline in the relative importance of the telephone—certainly as the prime
forum for customer service provision, both inside and outside of customer
interaction centers.
Already a number of enterprises are beginning to
contemplate a displacement of telephone-based call centers by other electronic
media, in particular email (web–facilitated and direct). It’s time to once
again put the humble telephone into proper context.
Crude Analysis. One way of doing
this, albeit somewhat simplistically, is to ignore cross-linking between
channels, and set each communication medium independently against some chosen,
non-weighted interaction-criteria. Naturally, the criteria, and their relative
importance, will vary according to the:
- nature of the business
- availability of the alternative media to existing
and potential customers
- customer’s degree of comfort with the various
alternatives
- customer interaction processes to be conducted
- levels of achievable competence for each
criterion
- need for formal "hardcopy"
A very generalised example of such an analysis
follows, and reveals an interesting rank order of customer interaction media
importance:
|
Communication
Medium
|
Criteria
|
Score
|
|
|
Speed
to make contact
|
Speed
of response once contact made
|
Convenience
to customer
|
"Reach"
irrespective of physical distance
|
Cost-efficiency
|
Quality
of task aspect of interaction
|
Quality
of relationship aspect of interaction
|
|
|
Telephone
|
3
|
5
|
4
|
5
|
2
|
4
|
4
|
27
|
|
Email
|
4
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
3
|
3
|
2
|
24
|
|
Face
to face
|
-
|
5
|
3
|
2
|
-
|
5
|
5
|
20
|
|
Web
Search/Interaction
|
4
|
3
|
2
|
5
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
20
|
|
Voice
response
|
3
|
5
|
3
|
5
|
2
|
1
|
-
|
19
|
|
Fax
|
3
|
2
|
2
|
5
|
2
|
3
|
2
|
19
|
|
Letter
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
12
|
|
|
Note: Convenience is a factor of time, location, ease, utility, choice
and a feeling of "being in control." Quality of task refers to
immediacy, flexibility, the satisfying of complexity. Quality of
relationship refers to perceived assurance, responsiveness, reliability,
empathy, confidentiality—in a nutshell, to "high touch."
(Scoring on this chart is from 0 to 5, being the degree to which the
communication medium meets a particular criterion: a score of 5 meaning
that the criterion is fully met. The source was a small sample of
interviews and conversations with information and communication
technology managers and business managers in medium to large financial
services and petroleum businesses—and represent subjective responses.
Like testing the heat of your bath water before jumping in—you get a
"reading" rather than an exact temperature. The
"readings" on the chart are relative rather than absolute.
This chart is designed to provide organizations with a design framework
for carrying out a formal study.)
|
Interpretation. The scoring in the above
example, together with the interpretation which follows, is intuitive rather
than intensively researched. The inferences to be drawn are:
- There is a place for each of the communication
channels, and this raises the challenge of increasingly professional
multi-channel scheduling and response management.
- Relative cost efficiency and technological
capacity will boost email and websearch volumes in future.
- The key strategic "tensions" for
service-oriented organisations to watch as the communications media
landscape develops, are:
- achieving
a good balance between "hi-tech" and "hi-touch";
- weighing
cost efficiency against service quality or value-added;
- prudently using automatic response technology
(for example voice response or web search) to "screen" service
providers from routine, standard communications, in order to improve
overall workflow efficiency. Against this desire must be offset the issues
of availability, warmth, unwittingly invoking customer frustration,
achieving short-term cost-benefit against the danger of increasing
remoteness and customer disenchantment.
- In transaction volume terms, although there may
be some decline in relative volume against email, the telephone remains our
single most important business instrument. Other technologies tend to
complement rather than reduce its usage. Advances in telephone mobility (for
example cellular phones) and functionality and convenience (for example
call-forwarding) increase flexibility and further entrench the two-way
exchanges that play such an important part in meeting our basic human need
for social interaction and relationships.
- Face to face conversation is the only medium
which offers both live audio and live visual content. even though largely
audio, the telephone carries most potential to gravitate to having a
commonplace, "non-remote" visual accompaniment feature. In any
event, the telephone offers the discerning user much in the way of
non-verbal cues such as voice tone, inflection, silences—so important in
meaningful two- way exchanges.
What message does this hold for organisations
serious about superior customer service? Superior service now and in future will
be about consistently connecting to customers both rationally and emotionally.
The telephone is an integral part of our
"connectivity" armoury. In many ways it is the benchmark for all that
we should seek in all of our communications, whatever format they take. The
principles and practices that make for civil and effective telephone
communications that address both the task and relationship aspects of customer
service need to be carried into all forms of interaction. This means in essence:
- That those who mindlessly rely mainly on
isolated, mechanistic measures of service "performance" such as
the number of calls per service provider per hour, will probably do the same
whatever alternate communication technologies they evolve. This approach
will not enhance customer relationships nor raise service levels.
- That those who understand and appreciate the
niceties of truly competent telephone service, and work hard at investing in
and growing the necessary communicating and relating expertise, are far more
likely to maintain the role of the telephone in their service delivery
endeavours—for both "non-routine" and a number of
"routine" exchanges. They are also more likely to transplant these
values and behaviours successfully to other alternative communication media.
This expertise includes skills and practices such as:
- answering
promptly and properly
- correctly
applying product, systems, process knowledge
- focused
hearing and listening
- avoidance
of "red flag" words and phrases that trigger negative responses
- avoiding
assumptions
- asking
open and probing questions appropriately
- conversation
"bridging"
- reflecting-back
- staying
calm
- being
non-judgemental, caring and responsive
- appropriately
varying tone, inflection and pace according to the other party's needs
- solving
problems, exercising judgement, making decisions
- terminating
effectively
The telephone is a vital aid to superior service
and will continue to fulfil this function in those organisations who best know
HOW to use it, in complementary ways with developing technologies.
Graham Williams is a management consultant and founder of Centre-ing
Services, an international consultancy focused on dissolving customer stress
points in organizations. He is based in Cape Town, South Africa. He can be
reached at http://www.centre-ingservices.com.
Back to the Top of The Page, The
Overview Page or The Managers
Files or Home Page.
